For engineering and product teams
Emily handles the coordination around your work.
Meet Emily, your AI teammate for coordination.
She understands what your team is trying to accomplish, notices when something needs coordination, gets the right people involved, and follows it through to resolution.
No new workflow. No individual signup. Add Emily to the places your team already works.
Emily can help arrange a demo with our founder and see whether she fits your team.
Emily at work
See what Emily is coordinating right now. Answers gathered, follow-ups handled, and work brought to resolution.
Selected activity. Names and message contents are kept private.
See more of Emily’s workRecent work
Loading recent activity…
The work isn’t stuck.
The coordination is.
Someone asks:
“Can we release full chat this quarter?”
- Engineering knows what is left to build.
- Product knows which requirements are negotiable.
- QA knows how much testing time is needed.
- Jira contains the current plan.
- Slack contains decisions and changes that happened afterward.
And somebody has to put all of that together.
They have to notice what doesn’t line up, figure out what is still unresolved, ask the right people, wait for answers, follow up, update the plan, and make sure everyone affected knows what changed.
Today, that somebody is usually a human.
A manager. A PM. A tech lead. Or simply whoever cares enough to chase it down.
Emily takes on that coordination.
Ask Emily once.
She takes it from there.
You can ask her directly:
“@emily can we release the full chat version this quarter?”
- 01
She understands the work.
Emily looks at the Goal, current work, previous decisions, dependencies, and relevant conversations.
She establishes what the team already knows before bothering anyone.
- 02
She notices what is unresolved.
Maybe Engineering's estimate assumes one scope while Product has another. Maybe a dependency still points to next quarter. Maybe two teams are working from different decisions.
Emily identifies what actually needs coordination.
- 03
She gets the right people involved.
Emily asks each person only for the input they can provide, with the context they need.
If someone doesn't respond, she follows up. If one answer creates another question, she keeps going.
- 04
She closes the loop.
She brings the resolution back, tells the people affected, and follows through on what happens next.
For example:
“Core chat can ship this quarter if SSO clears QA by Wednesday. File sharing would move the release into next quarter. Product confirmed core chat as the release scope. Jira has been updated and the launch team notified.”
That is the difference between getting an AI answer and having someone coordinate the work.
Illustrative scenario and response, not a live customer conversation.
She doesn’t have to wait for you to ask.
A coordinator should notice things too. Once connected to the relevant work, Emily can pick up situations such as:
A decision changed.
Someone downstream is still working from the old one.
A Goal is drifting.
The blocker depends on another person or team.
Two sources disagree.
The team may be operating from conflicting assumptions.
Someone is waiting.
An unanswered question is holding up the next step.
A decision was made.
The people affected still need to hear about it.
Emily can get the right people involved and follow through instead of waiting for someone to notice and manually chase it.
Don’t give your team another AI tool.
Give them another teammate.
Most software asks every employee to sign up, open another application, learn another workflow, and remember when to use it. Emily works differently.
Everyone can work with Emily.
Once Emily is part of the team, the people she works with do not need individual Meetless accounts just to talk to her.
Emily has her own identity.
She coordinates as Emily. She does not pretend to be you when she asks someone for an answer.
Emily works where the team already works.
We're building Emily around the places coordination already happens: Slack, email, Goals, Jira, Confluence, and the AI agents doing work for the team.
Emily remembers the context.
What was decided. Why it was decided. What changed. Who owns what. Who is affected. The next conversation can start from where the last one ended.
Her job is already defined.
You do not need to build an agent or configure a workflow every time something needs coordinating. Emily's job is coordination.
One teammate. Across the team.
You shouldn’t have to decide which employees deserve an “Emily seat.” If Emily is coordinating your team, everyone involved should be able to work with her.
- A developer can ask her a question.
- A product manager can give her a Goal.
- Emily can reach out to QA when she needs an answer.
- A teammate can reply to her by email.
And the resulting context belongs to the coordination happening across the team, not to one person’s private AI session.
Emily is not an assistant that coordinates for one person. She is a teammate that coordinates with the team.
Built for a world with more AI workers.
AI is making individual execution dramatically faster.
Developers have coding agents. Sales teams have sales agents. Marketing, research, support, finance, and operations are all gaining AI workers.
That means companies can produce more work than ever before. It also means more:
- decisions
- dependencies
- handoffs
- changes
- conflicting context
Somebody still has to coordinate all of it.
We believe every company will eventually need an AI coordinator.
We’re building Emily.
One coordinator. Across people and AI agents.
People and AI agents run into surprisingly similar problems: stale information, missed changes, and work left unresolved. Emily keeps both aligned with what is true now.
People
Email · Slack · Discord
Bring Emily into the conversations where the work already happens. On email, add her address to To or Cc and she asks the right people, follows up, and brings the answer back to the thread. Bcc or forward her instead when you want a private reply. Email needs no OAuth, no mailbox access, and no admin.
See Emily at workCoding agents
Claude Code · Codex
Coding agents can retrieve both the old decision and the new one and still act on the wrong one. MLA is the coding-agent side of Emily’s coordination system: it keeps the human-approved decisions still in force in front of the agent before it acts.
Emily for CodeSame coordination system. Different intervention.
Early access
Add Emily to your team.
We’re starting with paid pilots and hands-on setup.
You don’t need to diagnose your coordination problems, design a workflow, or decide exactly what Emily should automate before we start. We’ll help connect Emily to a real part of your team’s work and let her start doing the job.
- 01
Meet Emily.
Tell us about your team and the tools you already use. That's enough to start.
Emily can help arrange a short conversation with our founder to confirm whether the current product fits your setup.
- 02
Bring her into the work.
We'll connect the agreed tools, Goals, and team access.
There is no artificial “demo task” you have to invent. Emily starts with the work your team is already doing.
- 03
See what she takes off your plate.
During the pilot, work with Emily normally. Ask her questions when you need her. Let her follow existing Goals and relevant conversations.
See what she notices, who she coordinates with, and what she can carry through without someone manually chasing it.
At the end, the question is simple:
Did the team have less coordination work to carry themselves?
If the answer is yes, keep Emily on the team.
What does a pilot look like?
A pilot is a real deployment, not a scripted proof of concept. Together we agree on:
- the team Emily will work with
- the systems she can access
- the Goals and work she should understand
- the actions she can take
- the pilot fee
- and the price to continue afterward
Then Emily goes to work. We review the results with you during the pilot and adjust access or behavior where necessary.
You do not need to define one “coordination task” for Emily.
Her job is to support the coordination happening around the team’s work.
Will Emily work with our tools?
We’re preparing pilots around Gmail, Slack, Discord, Jira, Confluence, Codex, Claude Code, and Emily Goals. We’ll confirm what we can support before the pilot begins.
Using something else? Tell us what your team uses and we’ll check your setup.
Why I’m building Emily
As an engineering leader, I spent too much of my time doing work around the work.
- Figuring out who was waiting on whom.
- Finding out whether a decision had actually been made.
- Realizing two teams were working from different assumptions.
- Repeating context.
- Following up.
- Making sure a change actually reached everyone affected.
That coordination mattered.
But every hour spent chasing it was an hour I wasn’t spending building, solving harder problems, or giving my team better input.
I’m building Emily so coordination can become somebody’s job without requiring another human to spend their day doing it.
An PhamFounder, MeetlessQuestions
Do I have to keep prompting Emily?
No.You can ask Emily directly, but her job isn't limited to answering prompts. Once connected to the relevant work, Emily can notice situations that need coordination and get the right people involved.When she needs your knowledge or a decision, she asks. Then she continues.
Do we need to decide what Emily should coordinate before starting?
No.You shouldn't have to map your coordination problems or design workflows before Emily can help. We'll understand your team, connect the relevant tools and Goals, and let Emily work with the coordination already happening around your day-to-day work.If there are particular areas you want her to pay attention to, you can tell her, but that isn't required.
Does everyone need a Meetless account?
No.Emily is added to the team rather than licensed as a separate application each employee has to use.People can work with Emily through the supported places where your team already communicates and works.
Is Emily another project-management tool?
No.Your work can stay in the systems you already use.Emily's job is to coordinate around that work: understand what is happening, notice what needs attention, involve the right people, follow up, and make sure the resolution reaches the people affected.
Does Emily make decisions for our team?
Not when the decision belongs to a person.Emily identifies what needs to be decided, brings the relevant context to the appropriate person, gets the answer, and follows through on what that decision changes.
What does Emily do with Goals?
Goals give Emily context about what the team is trying to accomplish.She can follow progress around those Goals, understand dependencies and changes, and coordinate when something threatens the outcome or requires input from someone else.
What is MLA?
MLA is Meetless's developer system for keeping coding agents aligned with human-approved decisions that are still in force.It powers the coding-agent side of Emily: with people, Emily intervenes through communication and follow-up; with coding agents, MLA puts the current decision into context before the agent acts.
Is MLA separate from Emily?
Developers can use MLA on its own today. It is also the machinery behind Emily for Code.Both run on the same coordination system and the same approved decisions, but they intervene differently: communication for people, context for coding agents.
Will Emily replace our meetings?
Some conversations genuinely need people together.Emily handles much of the information gathering, follow-up, status chasing, and propagation around the work so fewer meetings have to exist simply because nobody knows what is happening.
Can I sign up and start on my own?
Not yet.Emily isn't designed primarily as a solo productivity tool. Her value appears when she is working with a real team.We're starting with paid pilots and hands-on setup so we can put Emily into genuine coordination and measure the result.
How much does Emily cost?
We're currently validating pricing through paid pilots.Our long-term model is a monthly subscription based on how much of the organization Emily is responsible for coordinating, not how many times employees talk to her.We'll agree on the pilot fee and continuation price before your pilot begins.
How do you handle access to company information?
During pilot setup, we agree on what Emily can access, who she can work with, and which actions she is allowed to take before connecting company information.Please keep private company information out of our public community channels.